Do you think being naked is actually "Dress of Love"?

Comments

  • depends on context and situation. a baby is born naked. we're naturally naked. ancient people wore very little. females exposed their breasts. even now there are nudists who have nothing to do with love.

    yep, it's the situation that naked means love. :D idk why!

  • No I don't. Being naked is 'dress of sex'...which has little to do with love.

  • If being naked means baring one's heart and soul... being naked from the core of one's being, no judgement, no separation... just naked into oneness, that could be true.

  • Interesting Q to look at a bit Philosophically!

    Stark naked can often be offensive or repulsive, rather leading to despise (or even fear) than love.

  • I think nakedness is the nature's cloth for the inner skeleton, the skin covers the inner skeleton, so it's the dress of inner skeleton lol

  • Life is a gift, your still wearing the "same wrapper,

    so it's a dress "for" love.

  • I'm gonna go with 'Dress of Nature'.

    But... dress of love... I like it.

    "Hey, Baby, mind if I wear my dress of love?"

  • I would say it is actually Dress of Lust

    Love is so much more...

  • Not sure about that........

    But its sure being with 'Nature'......... cuz we all came to this world naked....... n then leant to hide our natural self in varying degrees as dictated by our customs and traditions......

  • NO= ITS giving away something for nothing. Mike

Sign In or Register to comment.